Subscribe to RSS feed
posted on 4 Aug 2017  -  10,224 views
Recently, I have changed how the "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage was computed, from being based on "Current Cost" to "Total Cost" (read more about it in
this article). However, several users have reached out and suggested that to base the "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage on "Total Cost" would penalize users who trade more frequently.
Upon further discussions, we came up with "Max Deployed Capital" as one possible candidate to base "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage upon. However, not everyone agrees that it is the best approach.
But perhaps, there is no single best approach. Rather, it's just finding the one that best suits you. Hence, you can now decide for yourself what your "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage should be based on via the
settings here, with the default being set to "Max Deployed Capital".
To recap, here are the definitions and explanations of each.
Definition: "Sum of [buy price x number of shares] for each stock currently in portfolio".
Explanation: This is simply the capital currently deployed. StocksCafe have been basing "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage on this for a long while and maybe you are used to it. The weakness of
this approach can be seen here.
Definition: Current Cost + "Sum of [buy price x number of shares] for each closed position".
Explanation: This is the total capital ever deployed. There will be double counting if you buy and sell regularly and reinvest the money to buy other stocks. This is why several users believe this depressed the "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage.
Max Deployed Capital
Definition: The maximum current cost at any time point.
Explanation: This prevents double counting if user reinvests the money. However, if there is a huge capital outflow (and not coming back), then "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage will be depressed. Example: If I started with $100,000 worth of stocks but because I needed cash (for whatever reasons), I closed many positions and diverted the money elsewhere leaving only $10,000 worth of stocks for the next 5 years, then it might not be reasonable to compute the returns based on $100,000 (max deployed capital).
Each approach has its pros and cons and may suit different users depending on their situation. Hence, I leave it to you to
decide what fits you best.
In any case, note that the most comparable and annualized way to compute returns is Time-Weighted and Xirr. They are shown in various places throughout StocksCafe.
p.s.: Some people might be wondering why I am spending so much effort on this single percentage computation. This is because I believe in making StocksCafe better (more accurate or more perfect) one step at a time.
Next Article >
< Previous Article
Completed! - Hong Kong & Malaysia ...
List All Articles
Other articles by evankoh
MemCached For A Faster StocksCafe
Since the drastic move to re-architecture StocksCafe and adding support for two new markets at the same time in April, StocksCafe website have became slower. I am aware of that and have been taking significant amount of time trying to improve it. To be very honest, I am not 100% sure what is the true cause although I am inclined to think that it is due to a summation of reasons such as poor database ...
Coming Back Soon: Dividend Information and More
It has been two weeks since my last update. I am happy to share that most administrative issues with SGX and third party data providers have been handled. Next on the list would be to tackle the technical issues of integrating data that I have licensed into SGXcafe. I have already started integrating dividend information, since this is something numerous users have been asking me about. At this point ...
On average, I spend one to two hours a day working on SGXcafe. Sometimes, the features added are large and obvious. At other times, they are essentially invisible to most users. Today, I would like to share a few "invisible" feature updates that have been made recently. 1) Desktop view on mobile phones As mobile phone screens become larger, there have been requests to view the standard desktop view ...