Subscribe to RSS feed
posted on 4 Aug 2017  -  17,850 views
Recently, I have changed how the "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage was computed, from being based on "Current Cost" to "Total Cost" (read more about it in
this article). However, several users have reached out and suggested that to base the "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage on "Total Cost" would penalize users who trade more frequently.
Upon further discussions, we came up with "Max Deployed Capital" as one possible candidate to base "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage upon. However, not everyone agrees that it is the best approach.
But perhaps, there is no single best approach. Rather, it's just finding the one that best suits you. Hence, you can now decide for yourself what your "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage should be based on via the
settings here, with the default being set to "Max Deployed Capital".
To recap, here are the definitions and explanations of each.
Definition: "Sum of [buy price x number of shares] for each stock currently in portfolio".
Explanation: This is simply the capital currently deployed. StocksCafe have been basing "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage on this for a long while and maybe you are used to it. The weakness of
this approach can be seen here.
Definition: Current Cost + "Sum of [buy price x number of shares] for each closed position".
Explanation: This is the total capital ever deployed. There will be double counting if you buy and sell regularly and reinvest the money to buy other stocks. This is why several users believe this depressed the "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage.
Max Deployed Capital
Definition: The maximum current cost at any time point.
Explanation: This prevents double counting if user reinvests the money. However, if there is a huge capital outflow (and not coming back), then "P&L + Dividends + Closed" percentage will be depressed. Example: If I started with $100,000 worth of stocks but because I needed cash (for whatever reasons), I closed many positions and diverted the money elsewhere leaving only $10,000 worth of stocks for the next 5 years, then it might not be reasonable to compute the returns based on $100,000 (max deployed capital).
Each approach has its pros and cons and may suit different users depending on their situation. Hence, I leave it to you to
decide what fits you best.
In any case, note that the most comparable and annualized way to compute returns is Time-Weighted and Xirr. They are shown in various places throughout StocksCafe.
p.s.: Some people might be wondering why I am spending so much effort on this single percentage computation. This is because I believe in making StocksCafe better (more accurate or more perfect) one step at a time.
Next Article >
< Previous Article
Completed! - Hong Kong & Malaysia ...
List All Articles
Other articles by evankoh
Becoming an Angel Investor
Last week, when I shared my portfolio in another article. I received comments privately from several people such as "50 stocks in your portfolio?!?! I think 30 should provide more than enough diversification", "Have you heard of Warren Buffet's 20 slot rules?", "Why are you holding so many different stocks?" etc. Well, there are a few reasons to this. 1) I have yet to devise or find a sound approach ...
Dividend Strength Estimator
Like many others, I enjoy buying stocks that pay good dividends. The challenge is in identifying companies that will be able to pay good dividends year after year. Many might suggest reading through years of financial statements, as well as getting to know the top management and their vision for the company as it is the ideal way of projecting its future cashflow and thus, dividends. I do agree that ...
Growing Dividends - Does Debt-to-equity Ratio and Operating Cashflow Matter?
I believe there are many investors like me who love to invest in companies that pay dividends. Naturally, we hope that companies we invest in would have growing dividends. So, the question is "How can we differentiate companies that will have growing dividends from others?" In an attempt to find an answer to this question, I will perform a series of analyses in this and upcoming articles. Today, I ...