Is the GSK share price too low, after another strong set of results?

The GSK share price has had a weak five years, and strong results for 2023 make me think the market has been getting this one wrong.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Female Doctor In White Coat Having Meeting With Woman Patient In Office

Image source: Getty Images

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

The GSK (LSE: GSK) share price really makes me scratch my head. Or, rather, its valuation does.

Investors have pushed AstraZeneca shares up 90% in the past five years. GSK, though, is up just 3% in the same time, well behind the FTSE 100‘s 9%.

Covid effect

It has to be the Covid effect. After all, only one of the two has a Covid vaccine named after it.

But there’s a big difference in their valuations. AstraZeneca’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is over 30, with just 10 to 11 for GSK.

Oh, and their dividend yields are well apart too. At AstraZeneca, the forecast is at just 2.2%. And GSK has just just posted a 3.7% yield for 2023.

On those alone, the GSK share price looks too low to me. And FY 2023 results don’t change my mind.

Sales and earnings

GSK recorded a 5% rise in total 2023 sales, to £30.3bn. Perhaps more tellingly, ex-Covid sales rose by 14%. A lot of that is in vaccines, with shingles vaccine Shingrix seeing 17% growth.

The respiratory virus vaccine Arexvy also racked up £1.2bn in sales, as one of “4 major product approvals” in the year.

All this helped boost earnings per share by 11%, and led to a dividend of 58p per share. The board already says it expects to pay 60p for 2024.

Upgraded outlook

GSK has lifted its long-term outlook. The five-year outlook from 2021 to 2026 has been lifted to more than 7% per year sales growth, with more than 11% per year for adjusted operating profit.

The firm also reckons it should see more than £38bn in annual sales by 2031. And isn’t it great to see a major FTSE 100 company with a focus on the long-term like that?

It has to, really, given the length of the drug development process. But I see it as a plus for private investors.

If we’re in it for the long term, then isn’t it better to put our cash into businesses that are aligned with the long term?

Dangers

The nature of the business does bring its own risks, though. GSK, along with AstraZeneca, faced a crisis a few years ago due to the expiry of some key patents.

Blockbuster drugs can provide a big chunk of a pharma firm’s income… until they don’t, and anyone can then make and sell them cheap. HIV treatment dolutegravir will be hit by that soon.

The expense and uncertainty of the development process means that replacements from the pipeline are not guaranteed.

And while CEO Emma Walmsley said “We are now planning for at least 12 major launches from 2025,” AstraZeneca is still ahead when it comes to drug candidates in the pipeline.

Time to buy?

On balance, based mainly on valuation, only one of the two big FTSE 100 pharma firms makes it on to my buy candidates list for 2024. And it’s GSK.

AstraZeneca might be a fine investment, but GSK looks better value now.

And a pharma investment is for life, not just for Covid, right?

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended AstraZeneca Plc and GSK. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

I’d follow Warren Buffett and start building a £1,900 monthly passive income

With a specific long-term goal for generating passive income, this writer explains how he thinks he can learn from billionaire…

Read more »

Investing Articles

A £1k investment in this FTSE 250 stock 10 years ago would be worth £17,242 today

Games Workshop shares have been a spectacularly good investment over the last 10 years. And Stephen Wright thinks there might…

Read more »

Asian man looking concerned while studying paperwork at his desk in an office
Investing Articles

10%+ yield! I’m eyeing this share for my SIPP in May

Christopher Ruane explains why an investment trust with a double-digit annual dividend yield is on his SIPP shopping list for…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Will the Rolls-Royce share price hit £2 or £6 first?

The Rolls-Royce share price has soared in recent years. Can it continue to gain altitude or could it hit unexpected…

Read more »

A senior man and his wife holding hands walking up a hill on a footpath looking away from the camera at the view. The fishing village of Polperro is behind them.
Investing Articles

How much should I put in stocks to give up work and live off passive income?

Here’s how much I’d invest and which stocks I’d target for a portfolio focused on passive income for an earlier…

Read more »

Google office headquarters
Investing Articles

Does a dividend really make Alphabet stock more attractive?

Google parent Alphabet announced this week it plans to pay its first ever dividend. Our writer gives his take on…

Read more »

Young mixed-race couple sat on the beach looking out over the sea
Investing Articles

Could starting a Stocks & Shares ISA be my single best financial move ever?

Christopher Ruane explains why he thinks setting up a seemingly mundane Stocks and Shares ISA could turn out to be…

Read more »

Investing Articles

How I’d invest £200 a month in UK shares to target £9,800 in passive income annually

Putting a couple of hundred of pounds each month into the stock market could generate an annual passive income close…

Read more »